Why MSRLab is human-directed—not fully autonomous

Agents can widen the search, implement faster, and challenge more aggressively. Judgment about evidence, risk, and capital remains human-governed.

MSRLab uses AI agents because they expand the number of ideas, implementations, tests, and critiques one researcher can examine. That is experimental capacity—not delegated conviction.

The research director still chooses the question, judges whether a test answers it, interprets ambiguity, and decides whether evidence is strong enough to affect capital. Agents can challenge those decisions, but they do not silently change risk or deploy live money.

This division matters because automation can produce answers faster than it produces understanding. The lab’s standard is therefore human-governed evidence with an auditable trail.

AIGovernance
CONTINUE READING

Related research notes.

Research article · 6 min

From trading gurus and perfect EAs to a research portfolio

Read ↗
Research article · 7 min

Why strategies are rejected: an MSRLab taxonomy

Read ↗